top of page
Writer's pictureOscar Mayr

The MVP does NOT šŸš«need good UX šŸ˜†šŸ˜‚šŸ¤£

Updated: Oct 18, 2022


Minimum Viable Product, three wonderful terms so very misinterpreted and misapplied.


We often hear statements like:


The MVP does not need to have good UX

The customer adoption is low, the market traction is low and the return on investment is low

Ā 

The MVP does not need to be complete

Core journeys partially missing and users do not find the product useful

Ā 

The MVP will be redesigned at a later stage

More time and money needed to achieve the same outcomes

Ā 

The MVP will be usability tested after go live

Design and development driven by assumptions with high risk of delivering the wrong thing


These are just a few we heard and read in articles through the years šŸ˜‚


The term MVP is industry agnostic.

A Minimum Viable Product (MVP) is a set of orchestrated and validated core journeys within the budget and time allocated, that allow the users, with the best possible experience, to accomplish their key objectives.


Click on this link, to read a great article that dissects and demystify the definition of the term MVP.


A clear roadmap with milestones and an agreed plan with the team and relevant stakeholders (including the design team) guarantees the delivery of MVPs that will be profitable for the business and useful for the users.


Even if your MVP is not a fully grown product, your users will find it usable, useful and fit for purpose. They will return.

ComentƔrios


bottom of page